Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40386015›Full record

ArticleTobacco prevention & cessation2025

Tobacco control in complex emergencies: Policy case study of Ukraine.

Andrii Skipalskyi, Jarno Habicht, Angela Ciobanu, Yelena Tarasenko, Tetyana Skapa

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco prevention & cessation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrii SkipalskyiWorld Health Organization, Country Office, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Jarno HabichtWorld Health Organization, Country Office, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Angela CiobanuWorld Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Yelena TarasenkoJiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Environmental Health Sciences, Statesboro, United States.
Tetyana SkapaDepartment of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This policy case study evaluates Ukraine's implementation of tobacco control measures, using guidance from the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) and its COP8 decision during the ongoing Russian invasion. The study assesses Ukraine's efforts across three pillars: 1) surveillance, 2) legislation and public health gains, and 3) adherence to the WHO FCTC Article 5.3. Despite war-related disruptions and a humanitarian crisis, Ukraine has upheld and strengthened policies like tobacco taxation, new pictorial health warnings on cigarette packs, advertising bans, and smoking restrictions, largely due to strong policy leadership and international collaborations driven by the European Union integration. Successes and political leadership over the past decade have reinforced Ukraine's compliance with the WHO FCTC. However, continued threats from the tobacco industry, especially efforts to weaken legislation and obstruct enforcement of regulations on new and emerging nicotine and tobacco products, remain a serious concern. This analysis underscores the vital role of a resilient public health infrastructure and sustained international support in protecting tobacco control progress, particularly during times of crisis.

Indexed as

emergencyFCTCNCDStobacco controlTPDUkraine

Identifiers

PMID40386015
PMCPMC12083187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.