ArticleArchives of plastic surgery2025
Challenges with Conventional Dermal Filler Guidelines: Considering Multi-Axes Facial Rotation Asymmetry Patterns.
Article in Archives of plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Asymmetrical Correction of Facial Rotation Using Unilateral Thread Insertion.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Facial asymmetry is inherent from birth, and it becomes more pronounced with age due to changes in the facial skeleton at various rates and locations. As new insights into "multi-axes facial rotation" patterns emerge, there is a pressing need to update the standards for facial assessment, consultation, and treatment to align with modern aesthetic practices. Traditional methods like MD Codes™ and BeautiPHIcation™, which focus on enhancing specific features or applying mathematical beauty principles, may not adequately address overall facial balance and may neglect the underlying skeletal asymmetries that contribute to a person's appearance. These approaches, while innovative, can result in treatments that might not fully appreciate or correct the foundational asymmetries present in the facial skeleton. Therefore, a comprehensive approach that includes a detailed assessment by skilled practitioners is essential to achieve a balanced aesthetic outcome that not only meets individual aesthetic needs but also enhances patient satisfaction through improved education and trust-building between the clinician and the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.