ArticleTherapeutic advances in infectious disease
Use of whole body PET scan in patients with infective endocarditis may impact care of those with intravascular devices: results from a comparative retrospective cohort study.
Article in Therapeutic advances in infectious disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Whole body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT (WBP) may be an important tool for the management of infective endocarditis (IE) by identifying areas of occult primary or metastatic infection. However, the optimal use of this study in patients with IE is unknown. Objectives: Compare clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients who did and did not have WBP as part of their endocarditis management, and describe the impact that WBP has on the management of IE. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: We performed a protocolized chart review of hospitalized patients with suspected IE who were discussed by a multidisciplinary endocarditis team at a tertiary care center between June 2018 and January 2022. Results: Among 427 patients, there were 114 patients (26.7%) in the WBP group and 313 patients (73.3%) in the non-WBP group. The WBP group was significantly more likely to have end-stage renal disease, intracardiac prostheses, and cardiac devices, while the non-WBP group was more likely to have flail leaflet or paravalvular abscesses. There were no statistically significant differences in mortality, hospital readmission, or length of stay between the two cohorts. The WBP group was more likely to receive longer antibiotic courses and had higher rates of suppressive antibiotics following treatment courses ( Conclusion: WBP plays an important role in identifying metastatic foci of infection and directly impacting the management of patients with confirmed or suspected endocarditis. Infected intravascular prostheses were effectively identified via WBP, and as a result, these patients were prescribed longer courses of antibiotics and suppressive antibiotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.