Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40385971›Full record

ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound

The role of artificial intelligence and deep learning in determining the histopathological grade of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors by using EUS images.

Sercan Kiremitci, Gulseren Seven, Gokhan Silahtaroglu, Koray Kochan, Serife Degirmencioglu Tosun, Hakan Senturk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sercan KiremitciDepartment of Gastroenterology, Bezmialem University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7901-1412
Gulseren SevenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Bezmialem University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3384-3197
Gokhan SilahtarogluManagement Information Systems Department, School of Business and Management Science, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8863-8348
Koray KochanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Bezmialem University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Serife Degirmencioglu TosunDepartment of Gastroenterology, Bezmialem University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3002-9133
Hakan SenturkDepartment of Gastroenterology, Bezmialem University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are relatively rare and consist of 2% of the all pancreatic tumors. Although some of pNETs have a benign, nonprogressive course, some may be progressive and result with metastasis. We aimed to estimate the grade of pNETs by using artificial intelligence (AI) via deep learning (DL) algorithms as indexing to cyto/histopathological classification according to the World Health Organization 2017. Methods: A total of 803 EUS images were collected from 44 patients who had a cyto/histo-pathologically confirmed diagnosis with EUS fine-needle aspiration or biopsy (FNA/B). First, raw EUS images were prepared for processing by AI via DL algorithms, and convolutional neural networks were utilized to train the machine to predict the grades from EUS images. IBM SPSS 25.0 program was used for statistical analyses. Results: Thirty of the 44 patients (68%) were female, with a median age of 61 (range, 16-80) years. pNETs were mostly located in the pancreatic head: 24 cases (55%). Location was the neck in 3 (7%), body in 10 (22%), and tail in 7 (16%) patients. According to EUS-FNA/B results, 27 patients were grade 1 (G1) (61%); 12, grade 2 (G2) (27%); and 5, grade 3 (G3) (12%). In reference to the performance of AI for predicting the pathological grade, sensitivity was 94.29%; specificity, 97.14%; and accuracy, 96.19%. When the patient groups were subanalyzed as G1, G2, and G3 by the AI model to predict the pathological grade, the accuracy was as follows: for G1, 93.15%; for G2, 91.61%; and for G3, 98.05%. Conclusions: This pilot study suggests that pNET grade prediction can be reliably done on EUS images using AI-based technology.

Indexed as

Artifical intelligenceDeep learningEUSGradePancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Identifiers

PMID40385971
PMCPMC12080687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.