Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40385966›Full record

ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound

Outcomes of a multicenter registry on EUS-guided gallbladder drainage as a rescue technique for malignant distal biliary obstruction after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Belén Martínez-Moreno, Gonzalo López-Roldán, Julia Escuer, Joan B Gornals, Carme Loras, Ana Gordo, Juan Vila, Sergio Bazaga, Miguel Durá, Vicente Sanchiz and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07655778 (Multicenter Comparative Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07655778 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

Multicenter Comparative Clinical Trial: EUS-Guided Gallbladder Drainage Versus Conservative Management in Patients Unfit for Surgery After a Biliary Event Without Cholecystitis. DRECON Study: (DRainage, Endoscopic Ultrasound, CONservative)

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Mutua de TerrassaRan2026 to 2029Enrolled110ConditionsCholecystectomy, Gallbladder, Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS), CholelithiasisArmsEUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD), Conservative management (CM)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Belén Martínez-MorenoHospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, Alicante, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4025-6735
Gonzalo López-RoldánHospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, Alicante, Spain.
Julia EscuerHospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Universidad de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain.
Joan B GornalsHospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Universidad de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8857-3556
Carme LorasHospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain.
Ana GordoComplejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Juan VilaComplejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Sergio BazagaHospital General de Granollers, Granollers, Spain.
Miguel DuráHospital Universitario de Cruces, Barakaldo, Spain.
Vicente SanchizHospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Natividad ZaragozaHospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain.
Ferrán Gonzalez-HuixClínica Girona, Girona, Spain.
Alejandro RepisoHospital Universitario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain.
José Ramón AparicioHospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, Alicante, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2245-4006

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the primary intervention for malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO). However, ERCP may fail for various reasons, requiring alternative interventions such as EUS-guided biliary drainage. Among EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) methods, EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) is emerging as a viable option for patients who have failed ERCP and EUS-BD. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EUS-GBD as salvage therapy for MDBO and its potential role in allowing the initiation of chemotherapy. Methods: This is a retrospective multicenter study of consecutive patients with MDBO with failed ERCP and/or EUS-BD that subsequently underwent EUS-GBD with lumen-apposing metal stent. Results: Ninety-six patients from 9 centers in Spain were included. Technical success was achieved in 99% of patients, while clinical success, defined as bilirubin reduction <50% within 14 days after the procedure, was achieved in 78.1% of patients. Bilirubin levels were normalized in 65.6% of patients. The median time to normalization of bilirubin levels was 15 (7-27) days. Related to continuation of oncological treatment, 44/77 (57.1%) eligible patients were able to start chemotherapy after the procedure, and 12/17 (70.6%) eligible patients underwent surgery in the end. Adverse events were observed in 26.3% of cases, with 3 patients requiring surgery and 3 deaths related to EUS-GBD. Conclusions: EUS-GBD represents a potential alternative to MDBO in cases where ERCP has failed, with an appropriate profile of patients starting chemotherapy. However, in light of the considerable number of adverse events and the moderate efficacy, it may be advisable to consider this approach as a second-line option.

Indexed as

ERCPEUSEUS-guided biliary drainageGallbladderLAMSMDBOTherapeutic EUS

Identifiers

PMID40385966
PMCPMC12080680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.