ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound
Long-term outcomes of EUS-guided antegrade intervention with transmural and transanastomotic plastic stenting for benign bilioenteric anastomotic strictures (with video).
Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Endoscopic ultrasound-assisted double-lumen-apposing metal stent septotomy for permanent partial reversal of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Recurrence of benign bilioenteric anastomotic strictures (BAS) is common after enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), percutaneous intervention, or EUS-guided antegrade intervention (EUS-AI). This study evaluated the long-term outcomes of EUS-AI with transmural and transanastomotic stenting (TAS) following EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (HGS) in BAS. Methods: Consecutive patients with BAS undergoing EUS-AI with or without TAS after failed deep enteroscopy between January 2016 and June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was BAS recurrence rate after TAS removal; secondary outcomes included technical success of AI, on demand endoscopic procedure (DP) rate, the time to DP, and adverse events. Results: Among 38 patients who underwent EUS-HGS, EUS-AI succeeded in 34 (89.5%), and 28 (73.7%) proceeded to TAS. The median follow-up duration for 28 patients with TAS was 53.4 months (IQR, 22.8-85.2). During TAS placement without regular stent change, DP occurred in 43% (12/28) at a median time of 23 months. The 1-year procedure-free rate was 81.2%. After TAS removal ( Conclusion: EUS-AI with indwelling TAS, without regular stent change, may offer promising long-term outcomes for BAS by reducing recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.