Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40385919›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction of Bariatric Surgery Complications: A Systematic Review.

Mohamed Ahmed Hassan Mukhtar, Ahmed Umballi Babiker Ahmed, Mohammed Awad Siddig Mohammed, Nasereldeen Omer Ibrahim Omer, Dalia Saad Altom, Mohey Aldien A Elnour

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohamed Ahmed Hassan MukhtarEmergency Medicine, Najran Armed Forces Hospital, Ministry of Defense Health Services, Najran, SAU.
Ahmed Umballi Babiker AhmedGeneral Surgery, Najran Armed Forces Hospital, Ministry of Defense Health Services, Najran, SAU.
Mohammed Awad Siddig MohammedGeneral Surgery, Damad General Hospital, Ministry of Health, Damad, SAU.
Nasereldeen Omer Ibrahim OmerGeneral Surgery, Afif General Hospital, Afif City, SAU.
Dalia Saad AltomFamily Medicine, Najran Armed Forces Hospital, Ministry of Defense Health Services, Najran, SAU.
Mohey Aldien A ElnourGeneral Surgery, Port Sudan Teaching Hospital, Port Sudan, SDN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity is a global health crisis, with bariatric surgery considered a highly effective intervention for sustained weight loss and resolution of associated health conditions. Despite its benefits, some patients experience postoperative complications, emphasizing the importance of accurate risk prediction. Traditional models often lack the capacity to manage complex clinical data. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers transformative potential for improving the prediction of surgical complications. This systematic review synthesizes existing research on AI's role in forecasting complications following bariatric surgery. The review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines, with searches conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore for studies examining AI applications in this context. Seven retrospective cohort studies were included, and data were extracted on study design, AI algorithms, and outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST, and a narrative synthesis was conducted due to study heterogeneity. The included studies showed variability in AI model performance, with ensemble methods and neural networks generally performing better than traditional logistic regression. Reported area under the curve (AUC) values varied widely, with higher accuracy noted for predicting specific complications such as diabetes and leaks. Key challenges included overfitting, data imbalance, and limited generalizability, especially in deep learning models. Most studies were conducted in Sweden and the United States, utilizing large datasets that may introduce regional biases. Overall, AI shows promise in enhancing complication prediction in bariatric surgery, though methodological limitations highlight the need for prospective, multicenter validation. Future research should focus on addressing data imbalance, refining feature selection, and facilitating the clinical integration of AI through decision-support systems to improve patient care.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebariatric surgerycomplications predictionmachine learningsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40385919
PMCPMC12085191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.