ReviewCureus2025
The Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction of Bariatric Surgery Complications: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty: A Systematic Review of Preliminary Evidence.Obesity surgery · 2026Pooled it
- The VALUE of AI-Guided Communication: Enhancing Shared Decision-Making in Metabolic Bariatric Surgery Consultations Through a Metacognitive Framework.Obesity surgery · 2026Trial
- Machine and Deep Learning Models for Preoperative Prediction of Suboptimal Clinical Response One Year after Metabolic Bariatric Surgery: Findings from the Tehran Obesity Treatment Study.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches for patient safety in complex surgery: a review.Patient safety in surgery · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Bariatric Surgery: Optimizing Personalized Decision-Making, Predictive Monitoring, and Postoperative Outcomes.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obesity is a global health crisis, with bariatric surgery considered a highly effective intervention for sustained weight loss and resolution of associated health conditions. Despite its benefits, some patients experience postoperative complications, emphasizing the importance of accurate risk prediction. Traditional models often lack the capacity to manage complex clinical data. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers transformative potential for improving the prediction of surgical complications. This systematic review synthesizes existing research on AI's role in forecasting complications following bariatric surgery. The review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines, with searches conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore for studies examining AI applications in this context. Seven retrospective cohort studies were included, and data were extracted on study design, AI algorithms, and outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST, and a narrative synthesis was conducted due to study heterogeneity. The included studies showed variability in AI model performance, with ensemble methods and neural networks generally performing better than traditional logistic regression. Reported area under the curve (AUC) values varied widely, with higher accuracy noted for predicting specific complications such as diabetes and leaks. Key challenges included overfitting, data imbalance, and limited generalizability, especially in deep learning models. Most studies were conducted in Sweden and the United States, utilizing large datasets that may introduce regional biases. Overall, AI shows promise in enhancing complication prediction in bariatric surgery, though methodological limitations highlight the need for prospective, multicenter validation. Future research should focus on addressing data imbalance, refining feature selection, and facilitating the clinical integration of AI through decision-support systems to improve patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.