ArticleCureus2025
Prevalence of Rheumatoid Factor and Anti-citrullinated Protein Antibodies in Patients With Post-treatment Lyme Disease.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post-treatment Lyme disease (PTLD) occurs in a portion of patients after initial antibiotic treatment of Lyme disease (LD) and is often characterized by arthralgia without synovitis. Rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) are often used to assess joint pain in this setting; however, their clinical utility remains unknown. Our objective was to define the frequency of these autoantibodies in a large cohort of carefully characterized patients with PTLD meeting a research case definition and to determine the clinical implications of these tests. RF and ACPA were tested as indicated clinically and abstracted by chart review. The prevalence of antibodies and their relationship to symptoms were examined. Of the 167 patients included in the analysis, RF status was documented at least once for 78.4% (131 of 167), and ACPA status was available at least once for 88.0% (147 of 167). RF was positive in 3.8% (five of 131), and ACPA was positive in 4.8% (seven of 147) at least at one time point. A total of 7.2% (12 of 167) patients were found to have a positive RF or ACPA test at least at one time point. There was no difference in the proportion of patients with RF and/or ACPA based on the initial presenting manifestations of their LD, nor the symptoms of PTLD at later evaluation; however, the small sample size may limit our ability to detect these clinical differences. We found a low prevalence of RF and ACPA in this study, similar to the known rates in the general population. This reflects the lack of inflammatory arthritis in this population with clinically defined PTLD and arthralgia only.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.