ArticleCureus2025
Peritoneal Metastasis Mimicking Chemotherapy-Induced Complications in Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Diagnostic Challenge of a Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Peritoneal Metastasis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review of Clinical Features, Molecular Profiles, Diagnostic Approaches, and Outcomes.Cancer management and research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report a case of a 64-year-old man with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who developed peritoneal metastasis during systemic treatment. Initially diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma with pleural dissemination and bone metastases, he received carboplatin, pemetrexed, and pembrolizumab, followed by docetaxel due to clinical progression. While primary lung lesions responded to docetaxel, the patient developed new-onset abdominal pain and ascites. Radiologic findings suggested peritoneal thickening, raising suspicion for either docetaxel-induced toxicity or disease progression. Given the rarity of peritoneal metastasis in NSCLC and concurrent treatment response elsewhere, drug-induced complications were initially considered. However, worsening symptoms and further imaging prompted cytological evaluation of ascitic fluid, which confirmed metastatic adenocarcinoma consistent with lung origin. This case highlights the diagnostic challenge of distinguishing treatment-related adverse events from disease progression, especially in patients presenting with nonspecific abdominal symptoms during therapy. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for uncommon metastatic sites when new symptoms arise, even in the setting of apparent response at the primary site.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.