ArticleCureus2025
Reflections and Readiness of Medical Students for Self-Directed Learning (SDL): An Observational Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/introduction Self-directed learning (SDL) is primarily an active learning technique that promotes higher-order cognitive skills and increases the self-efficacy of students. Through SDL, the onus of learning primarily lies with the students. Medical students need to be lifelong learners, as it is crucial to update their knowledge and apply the same in clinical practice. SDL plays a vital role in inculcating the habit of reading and learning in medical graduates. It also helps in developing all the domains of learning, such as cognitive, psychomotor, and affective. Materials and methods In this observational, questionnaire-based, cross-sectional study, a total of 208 first- and third-year medical students (104 students in each batch) were asked to fill out a pre-validated questionnaire form to record the reflections and readiness of the students regarding SDL in medical education. The participants were asked to select from a Likert scale of "strongly disagree," "disagree," "neutral," "agree," and "strongly agree." An open-ended questionnaire was used to record the views and reflections of students about the concept of SDL in medical education. Results were tabulated on an Excel sheet (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington), and descriptive statistical measures such as means and percentages were used for analysis of the data. Results Approximately 90 (86.53%) of third-year professional students responded positively to SDL readiness, whereas it was approximately 80 (76.92%) among first-year professional students. The majority of students, 198 (95.19%), revealed that the biggest challenges for the successful implementation of active learning through SDL are time constraints and the need for extensive planning and research skills. Conclusions Our study concluded that, overall, the third-year professional students showed higher reported readiness for learning the concepts through SDL in all three domains, such as motivation for learning, planning and implementation, and interpersonal communication skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.