Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40385829›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Cholelithiasis With a Rare Branched Accessory Hepatic Duct: A Case Report.

Koki Kawakami, Koji Yasuda, Ryoji Hyakudomi, Jun Otani

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Koki KawakamiSurgical Gastroenterology, Unnan City Hospital, Unnan City, JPN.
Koji YasudaSurgical Gastroenterology, Unnan City Hospital, Unnan City, JPN.
Ryoji HyakudomiSurgical Gastroenterology, Unnan City Hospital, Unnan City, JPN.
Jun OtaniSurgical Gastroenterology, Unnan City Hospital, Unnan City, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The patient was a 71-year-old male who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Preoperative ERCP (Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography) and MRCP (Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography) did not reveal any obvious biliary tract anomalies. However, during surgery, a vascular structure was observed while dissecting the dorsal side of the gallbladder. The blade of the ultrasonic coagulation and cutting device came into contact with this structure, resulting in bile leakage. The posterior sectoral hepatic duct was found to merge with the common bile duct dorsally, distal to the confluence with the cystic duct. The damaged site was sutured and closed with 4-0 non-absorbable sutures. An accessory hepatic duct is a biliary tract anomaly in which an intrahepatic bile duct supplying a subsegmental liver region courses extrahepatically and drains into the common hepatic duct, common bile duct, gallbladder, or cystic duct. It is crucial to thoroughly evaluate the biliary anatomy preoperatively. Additionally, the surgeon must be well-versed in repair techniques and biliary reconstruction procedures.

Indexed as

accessory hepatic ductbile leakagecholecystectomycholelithiasiscritical view of safety

Identifiers

PMID40385829
PMCPMC12084775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.