ArticleCureus2025
Residency Program Characteristics Associated With Osteopathic Resident Representation.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Osteopathic (DO) medical students encounter unique challenges applying and matriculating to postgraduate training programs. To better understand these challenges and where DO students matriculate for residency, we aimed to examine program characteristics associated with higher DO resident representation among postgraduate programs in the United States. Methodology We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accredited residency programs within the 10 largest specialties (i.e., with the most training spots) cataloged within the Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database Access (FREIDA) dataset in 2022. We explored program-level characteristics associated with DO representation, DOs constituting ≥33% of residents, presenting descriptive statistics and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) clustered at the sponsor level. Each level of non-binary categorical variables was analyzed as an indicator variable, while continuous variables were rescaled by dividing by two standard deviations to facilitate comparing the strength of associations between DO representation and each program-level characteristic. Results Of the 3,364 programs from the 10 specialties included in the study, 2,284 (67.9%) had <33% DO residents, and 1,080 (32.1%) had ≥33%. Former American Osteopathic Association (AOA) accreditation was more common at programs with ≥33% DO residents (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.