ArticleCureus2025
Prevalence and Reporting Rates of Extraspinal Findings for Lumbar Spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Ghanaian Tertiary Hospital.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Extraspinal findings are commonly detected on magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine, but these findings are sometimes omitted from radiological reports. Failing to report these findings could have a clinical impact on the patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and reporting rates of extraspinal findings on lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging. Methods Retrospective analysis was done on lumbar spine magnetic resonance images done at the Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital between January 2020 and December 2021. A total of 1267 patients underwent lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging within the period. The degree of clinical significance of the extraspinal findings was ascertained using the computed tomography colonography reporting and data system classification scheme. The reporting rate was determined by referring to the archived radiological reports. Statistical analysis was done using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25 (Released 2017; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States). Results A total of 737 extraspinal findings were detected from 530 patients. The overall reporting rate of extraspinal findings was 62.6% (461/737). The most common extraspinal finding was a simple renal epithelial cyst (n = 333). Clinically significant findings were detected in 107 out of the 530 patients; 36.4% of the clinically significant findings were not reported when compared with the archived reports. Conclusion Extraspinal findings on lumbar spine imaging were common in our study population. When radiologists are reporting lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging, it is crucial to be aware of the risk of missing clinically significant findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.