Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40385805›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Sepsis Alerts in the Pre-hospital Setting: An Observational Retrospective Study of Emergency Medical Services' Response in Portugal (2020-2023).

Adelaide Moutinho, Joana Fontes, Lénia Ferreira, José Lopes, Fábio Martins, Solange Mega, Margarida Gil, Filipa Barros, Ana Margarida Correia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Adelaide MoutinhoInternal Medicine: Sepsis Care Process, Instituto Nacional de Emergência Médica, I.P., Porto, PRT.
Joana FontesNursing, Sepsis Care Process, Instituto Nacional de Emergência Médica, I.P., Porto, PRT.
Lénia FerreiraNursing, Sepsis Care Process, Instituto Nacional de Emergência Médica, I.P., Coimbra, PRT.
José LopesNursing, Sepsis Care Process, Instituto Nacional de Emergência Médica, I.P., Lisboa, PRT.
Fábio MartinsNursing, Sepsis Care Process, Instituto Nacional de Emergência Médica, I.P., Porto, PRT.
Solange MegaNursing, Sepsis Care Process, Instituto Nacional de Emergência Médica, I.P., Faro, PRT.
Margarida GilEpidemiology and Public Health, Department of Coordination of the Integrated Medical Emergency System, Instituto Nacional de Emergência Médica, I.P., Lisboa, PRT.
Filipa BarrosInternal Medicine, Department of Coordination of the Integrated Medical Emergency System, Instituto Nacional de Emergência Médica, I.P., Lisboa, PRT.
Ana Margarida CorreiaInternal Medicine, Department of Coordination of the Integrated Medical Emergency System, Instituto Nacional de Emergência Médica, I.P., Lisboa, PRT.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that demands prompt recognition and intervention to enhance patient outcomes. Early identification and timely treatment, particularly in the prehospital setting, are essential.​ Objective This study aims to characterize sepsis pre-alerts issued by the Portuguese Emergency Medical Services (EMS) early warning system between May 2020 and December 2023, focusing on adult patients. It provides an overview of the alert system and examines associated clinical data, therapeutic interventions, and hospital referrals.​ Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on sepsis pre-alerts from the Portuguese EMS database. Data collected included patient demographics, comorbidities, National Early Warning Score (NEWS), interventions administered, and outcomes.​ Results A total of 537 sepsis alerts were identified, with a median patient age of 83 years. The majority of patients had significant cardiovascular and neurological comorbidities. The average NEWS was 11.74. Advanced Life Support (ALS) or Integrated Life Support (ILS) teams were required in 76.9% (N=413) of cases. Interventions included intravenous fluid administration in 49.3% (N=265), oxygen therapy in 46.2% (N=248), and vasopressor use in 3.9% (N=14). Conclusions Effective prehospital sepsis management is crucial for improving patient outcomes. Challenges such as delayed hospital transfers, often due to regional constraints, highlight the need for enhanced integration between EMS and hospital care. Future efforts should focus on optimizing early sepsis management, fostering collaboration between EMS and hospital teams, and exploring the feasibility of prehospital antibiotic administration.

Indexed as

emergency medical servicespre-alertpre-hospitalsepsissepsis management

Identifiers

PMID40385805
PMCPMC12085950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.