ReviewCureus2025
Effects of Advance Care Planning on the Mental Health of Bereaved Families: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Examining Quality-of-Life Priorities of Older Adults Receiving Hemodialysis: A Q-Methodology Study.Kidney medicine · 2026Article
- Physicians and relatives facing end-of-life decisions in intensive care: ethical insights from a comparison of French and American models.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Factors predicting intention to engage in advance care planning among patients with chronic kidney disease in Thailand: A cross-sectional study.Belitung nursing journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Decisions regarding end-of-life care are often made by surrogate decision makers, such as family members. These decisions can place a significant psychological burden on surrogates, especially when the patients' wishes are unclear. Advance care planning (ACP) is a patient-centered preconsultation process that is expected to improve the mental health of surrogate decision-makers. This study aimed to clarify the impact of ACP intervention on the mental health of bereaved families and verify its effectiveness. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies evaluating ACP interventions published up to 2024. Studies were independently selected by two researchers using the Covidence systematic review software (Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia). The inclusion criteria were (i) studies evaluating the effectiveness of ACP interventions, (ⅱ) studies reporting bereaved mental health outcomes, and (ⅲ) randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Among the 2,025 studies initially identified, 12 RCTs were included. All interventions involved health professionals trained to facilitate ACP discussions before the patient died. Mental health was assessed using depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder scales. The items for which significant differences were reported varied among the studies, but several studies reported effectiveness in treating depression in bereaved families. Furthermore, when baseline-adjusted results were included, ACP interventions reduced post-bereavement anxiety and stress experienced by families. In conclusion, depending on the targets and intervention methods, pre-death discussions may improve the mental health of bereaved families. Thus, ACP should be implemented to help bereaved families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.