ArticleCureus2025
Optimal Provider Position for Video-Assisted Laryngoscopy of a Supine Patient on the Floor.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction This study presents a direct comparison of prone, kneeling, and straddling provider positions during endotracheal intubation of a supine patient on the ground, focusing on success rates, time, and ease of intubation. Methods Forty-five prehospital providers from a single Emergency Medical Services (EMS) program performed intubations on a manikin using a McGrath video laryngoscope (Medtronic, Minneapolis, USA) in prone, kneeling, and straddling positions. Each provider had three attempts per position, with success defined as the endotracheal tube passing through the vocal cords. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and Bonferroni corrections were used for statistical analysis. Results The kneeling position had the highest success rate (97.8% on all three attempts), followed by the prone position (91.1%). The straddling position had the lowest success rate (66.7%). Median intubation times were 8.8 seconds for prone, 9.8 seconds for kneeling, and 22.0 seconds for straddling. Statistically significant differences were found between the straddling position and both the kneeling and prone positions (p < 0.001). Conclusion Providers were most successful and efficient in the kneeling and prone positions for intubating patients on the ground. The straddling position was the least effective and required more time. These findings suggest that training programs should emphasize kneeling and prone positions to improve prehospital airway management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.