ArticleAnnals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine2024
A REVIEW OF ULTRASOUND-GUIDED PNEUMATIC ENEMA IN THE REDUCTION OF INTUSSUSCEPTION IN CHILDREN: INSIGHTS FROM A TEACHING HOSPITAL IN NIGERIA.
Article in Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of nonoperative management for pediatric intussusception in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Pediatric radiology · 2026Pooled it
- Non-Operative Reduction of Childhood Intussusception in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Review of Techniques, Outcomes, and Emerging Challenges.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical AssociationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pneumatic reduction, as a non-operative mode of treating intussusception, is traditionally done under fluoroscopy guidance. However, fluoroscopy guidance is fraught with exposure to ionizing radiation and fluoroscopy machines may not be routinely available especially in low-and-middle-income countries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety and predictive factors of successful reduction of intussusception using the ultrasound-guided pneumatic technique. Materials & Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of children, 3 to 36 months of age, who were confirmed to have intussusception by abdominal ultrasonography and had pneumatic (air) reduction under ultrasound guidance between December 2018 to December 2020. Patients with bowel perforation, peritonitis, non-responsive shock or recurrent intussusception were excluded. Success rate, time to reduction, complication (recurrence and perforation) rate, and predictive factors for successful reduction were evaluated. Results: Thirty (36.1%) out of 83 patients who presented with intussusception during this period had ultrasound-guided pneumatic reduction. The mean age was 6.1±1.6 (range: 4 to 9) months. Male to female ratio was 2.3:1. About one-third of the patients presented within ≤48 hours of onset of symptoms. 21 patients (70%) had a successful reduction. The mean time to reduction was 10.51 ± 4.19 (range: 3 to 16) minutes. One patient had recurrence giving a recurrence rate of 3.3%. There was no case of perforation. Patients who had successful reduction significantly had palpable abdominal mass (p = 0.0139), serum sodium >135mmol/l (p = 0.0419) and serum potassium >3.5mmol/l (p = 0.0318). Only serum potassium >3.5mmol/l (Odd ratio (OR), 6.9; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2 - 40.3; p = 0.03) was significantly associated with successful reduction on multivariable analysis. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided pneumatic reduction of ileocolic intussusception is feasible, effective and safe. It may be used in the treatment of children who present with ileocolic intussusception. Serum potassium >3.5mmol/l may suggest the likelihood of successful reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40385717PMC12082682What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.