ArticleAnnals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine2024
EARLY IMPACTS OF FUEL SUBSIDY REMOVAL ON MENTAL HEALTH STATUS OF PRIMARY HEALTHCARE WORKERS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS IN NIGERIA: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY.
Article in Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The abrupt removal of fuel subsidy in Nigeria led to exponential increase in fuel prices. The resultant economic pressure may have effects on the mental health status of Nigerians. The objective is to understand this impact, we assessed changes in mental health status among primary healthcare workers and community members after fuel subsidy removal. Materials & Methods: We carried out cross-sectional study in six Local Government Areas (LGA) across three Nigerian states and surveyed healthcare workers and community members. We analysed respondents' socio-demographic characteristics and their perceptions of fuel subsidies and mental health risks using summary statistics. Additionally, we evaluated depression and anxiety severity among respondents before and after the subsidy removal using the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scales, reporting findings by state and percentage increases in the subsidy removal?s impact on healthcare workers and community members. Results: We found a rise in depression and anxiety, particularly among younger adults. HCWs in Jigawa state faced the most severe increase, with depression rates nearly tripling. Similarly, community members across various demographics saw a significant rise in depression and anxiety after the policy change. According to state, Jigawa state bore the brunt, with depression and anxiety rising by over 200% while market women experienced the highest increase within occupational groups. Conclusion: This study shows that younger adults, single individuals, residents of disadvantaged areas, and market women were mostly affected. The widespread mental health crisis necessitates broad interventions targeting these groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40385704PMC12082668What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.