ArticleJournal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab2025
Quantification of glucagon and oxyntomodulin by protein precipitation-immunoaffinity enrichment-LC-MS/MS.
Article in Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- α cells use both PC1/3 and PC2 to process proglucagon peptides and control insulin secretion.Science advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Glucagon and oxyntomodulin are peptide hormones differentially released from proglucagon that function in regulating blood glucose. Their overlapping amino acid sequences make the development of specific immunoassays difficult, but the specificity of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry can be used to distinguish the peptides. We aimed to develop a sensitive and specific mass spectrometric assay that uses non-proprietary reagents and normal-flow liquid chromatography in the simultaneous quantification of both analytes. Methods: Bulk plasma proteins were precipitated in ethanol/ammonium hydroxide. Analytes were enriched using monoclonal antibodies generated in-house and analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. A glucagon calibration material was sourced commercially and characterized for purity and concentration by high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detection and amino acid analysis. Single-point calibration was used to minimize between-day variability. Results: The novel antibodies performed acceptably (peptide recovery 45-59 %). The assay was precise (<13 %CV) and linear over the range of 1.3-14.7 pM and 1.1-13.7 pM for glucagon and oxyntomodulin, respectively. The glucagon calibration material concentration was determined to be 1.596 mg/g. Tube-type studies supported the use of protease inhibitor tubes at the time of blood draw. Patients with type 1 diabetes had lower concentrations of glucagon when maintained on an insulin pump, but not with injectable insulin. Conclusion: We have validated a method with a highly detailed standard operating procedure. We have characterized calibration materials to help maintain accuracy and achieve between-day and between-laboratory harmonization. The assay will be beneficial in better understanding α-cell health and glycemic control in diabetes and other diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.