ReviewAnnals of joint2025
Brachial plexus injuries in the contact athlete: a narrative review.
Review in Annals of joint, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Future directions of brachial plexus injuries in contact athletes.Annals of joint · 2026Article
- Mechanisms and pathophysiology in 'stingers' and brachial plexus injury.Annals of joint · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Brachial plexus injuries (BPIs) are a rare but potentially devastating injury among contact athletes. More common injuries, such as "burners" or "stingers", indicate a temporary and less severe insult to either the nerve roots or plexus. The aim of this review is to discuss this spectrum of injuries in their epidemiology, mechanism in contact sports, diagnosis, and treatment. Methods: This literature review utilized key terms to search manuscripts available in English from inception to October 2024 within three research databases. Key Content and Findings: BPIs among contact athletes occur on a spectrum from neuropraxia to neurotmesis. Neuropraxia is very common among contact athletes with approximately a 49-65% incidence among career football players with the most common mechanism being a traction injury. Most of these resolve within minutes to hours. Axonotmesis and neurotmesis can be far more severe injuries and require further investigation if not resolved by 2-3 weeks. The majority of athletes who suffer neuropraxic injuries will return to sport with minimal to no time missed, however, more severe injuries portend variable outcomes. Conclusions: BPIs are common among contact athletes and involve a spectrum of nerve damage, of which most are self-limiting. However, further evaluation is warranted when symptoms last beyond 2-3 weeks. Future studies should focus on treatment algorithms and long-term outcomes, including return to sport.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.