Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40385630›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Unequal benefits: the effects of health insurance integration on consumption inequality in rural China.

Linlin Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Linlin HanSchool of Economics and Management, Qilu Normal University, Jinan, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Unlocking the consumption potential of rural residents and narrowing the consumption gap is crucial for expanding domestic demand and enhancing social equity. This study examined how integrating Urban-Rural Residents Medical Insurance (URRMI) affected consumption inequality among rural residents and its underlying mechanisms. Methods: We analyzed 17,092 observations from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) 2012-2018. Consumption inequality was measured using the Kakwani relative deprivation index. A staggered difference-in-differences (DID) design with high-dimensional fixed effects was employed to analyze the impact of the urban-rural health insurance integration policy on consumption inequality. Robustness checks such as placebo tests, heterogeneity in treatment effects, and spatial spillover analyses were addressed. Results: The findings reveal that the policy significantly raises consumption levels among middle and high-income groups while concurrently reducing expenditures for the lowest-income bracket, exacerbating consumption inequality. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that the impact of urban-rural health insurance integration on rural consumption inequality is manifested in both consumption structure and life-cycle effects, with the most significant disparities observed in subsistence and enjoyment consumption, particularly among middle-aged and older age groups. Mechanism analysis identifies increased utilization of medical services, the release of precautionary savings among middle and high-income cohorts, and variations in health insurance funding modalities as key drivers of the widening consumption inequality gap. Discussion: The study concludes with recommendations to promote the establishment of parity in urban-rural integrated health insurance and to prioritize policy support for vulnerable groups, especially the older adult and impoverished households.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesInsurance, HealthRural PopulationAdultAgedChinaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocioeconomic Factorsconsumption inequalityhealth insurancerelative deprivation indexrural residentsstaggered difference-in-differences methodurban–rural health insurance integration

Identifiers

PMID40385630
PMCPMC12081458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.