Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40385622›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Building trust during crises by engaging with existing distrust.

Tarun Kattumana, Heidi J Larson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tarun KattumanaHusserl Archives and Center for Phenomenology and Continental Philosophy, Institute for Philosophy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Heidi J LarsonDepartment of Infectious Disease Dynamics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has often been argued that trust cannot be built during crises. While this line of thinking recognizes the importance of building trust before or after crises, it negates the possibility of building trust during a crisis. This paper offers two scenarios to argue for the possibilities of building trust during crises by engaging with existing distrust, with special reference to examples during the COVID-19 pandemic. The first considers distrust towards vaccines and public health interventions among Black Americans that was addressed through interventions that partnered with trusted third parties during the COVID-19 pandemic. The second discusses the Indian transgender community where trust networks built between public health organizations and activists groups was mobilized to engage with existing distrust during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite the success of these interventions, this perspective paper ends by clarifying that engaging with distrust does not have to result in achieving public health goals with a brief considerations of two cases: the polio vaccine boycott in Nigeria (2003) and medical populism in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. These examples highlight that if existing distrust toward the medical system is not addressed, then space is created during crises-periods for distrust to be mobilized in ways that compromise public health goals.

Indexed as

COVID-19TrustBlack or African AmericanHumansMaleNigeriaPandemicsPublic HealthSARS-CoV-2United StatesCOVID-19 pandemiccrisisdistrustmedical populismtrustvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID40385622
PMCPMC12081413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.