ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Predicting clinical outcomes at hospital admission of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia using artificial intelligence: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04561219 (Nitazoxanide for Moderate to Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Nitazoxanide for Moderate to Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia: a Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term chest CT abnormalities up to 4.5 years after COVID-19 hospitalization and their association with dyspnea and fatigue: a prospective cohort study.Respiratory research · 2026Article
- Severity assessment of COVID-19 disease: radiological visual score versus automated quantitative CT parameters using a pneumonia analysis algorithm.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Predicting clinical improvement after hospital admission in patients with COVID-19 is crucial for effective resource allocation. Machine-learning tools can help identify patients likely to show clinical improvement based on real-world data. This study used two approaches-least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and CombiROC-to identify predictive variables at hospital admission for detecting clinical improvement after 7 days. Methods: A secondary analysis was conducted on the modified intention-to-treat placebo group from a previous randomized clinical trial (RCT, NCT04561219) of patients with COVID-19. The analysis assessed clinical, laboratory, and blood markers at admission to predict clinical improvement, defined as a two-point increase on the World Health Organization clinical progression scale after 7 days. LASSO and CombiROC were used to select optimal predictive variables. The Youden criteria identified the best threshold for different variable combinations, which were then compared based on the highest area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy. AUCs were compared using DeLong's algorithm. Results: Overall, 203 patients were included in the analysis, and they were divided into two groups; clinical improvement ( Conclusion: For patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia, predictive variables identified by LASSO and CombiROC analyses demonstrated similar accuracy and AUCs in predicting clinical improvement. LASSO, with fewer variables (SaO Clinical trial registration: Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (REBEC) number RBR-88bs9x and ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT04561219.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.