Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40385586›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Predicting clinical outcomes at hospital admission of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia using artificial intelligence: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial.

Caio César Souza Conceição, Camila Marinelli Martins, Mayck Medeiros Silva, Hugo Caire de Castro Faria Neto, Davide Chiumello, Patricia Rieken Macedo Rocco, Fernanda Ferreira Cruz, Pedro Leme Silva

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04561219 (Nitazoxanide for Moderate to Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04561219 phase2completednot on this map

Nitazoxanide for Moderate to Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia: a Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroRan2020 to 2020Enrolled500ConditionsCovid19, Corona Virus Infection, Pneumonia, ViralArmsNitazoxanide, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Caio César Souza ConceiçãoLaboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Institute of Biophysics Carlos Chagas Filho, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Camila Marinelli MartinsAAC&T Research Consulting LTDA, Curitiba, Brazil.
Mayck Medeiros SilvaLaboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Institute of Biophysics Carlos Chagas Filho, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Hugo Caire de Castro Faria NetoLaboratory of Immunopharmacology, Oswaldo Cruz Institute (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Davide ChiumelloDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Patricia Rieken Macedo RoccoLaboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Institute of Biophysics Carlos Chagas Filho, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Fernanda Ferreira CruzLaboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Institute of Biophysics Carlos Chagas Filho, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Pedro Leme SilvaLaboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Institute of Biophysics Carlos Chagas Filho, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Predicting clinical improvement after hospital admission in patients with COVID-19 is crucial for effective resource allocation. Machine-learning tools can help identify patients likely to show clinical improvement based on real-world data. This study used two approaches-least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and CombiROC-to identify predictive variables at hospital admission for detecting clinical improvement after 7 days. Methods: A secondary analysis was conducted on the modified intention-to-treat placebo group from a previous randomized clinical trial (RCT, NCT04561219) of patients with COVID-19. The analysis assessed clinical, laboratory, and blood markers at admission to predict clinical improvement, defined as a two-point increase on the World Health Organization clinical progression scale after 7 days. LASSO and CombiROC were used to select optimal predictive variables. The Youden criteria identified the best threshold for different variable combinations, which were then compared based on the highest area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy. AUCs were compared using DeLong's algorithm. Results: Overall, 203 patients were included in the analysis, and they were divided into two groups; clinical improvement ( Conclusion: For patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia, predictive variables identified by LASSO and CombiROC analyses demonstrated similar accuracy and AUCs in predicting clinical improvement. LASSO, with fewer variables (SaO Clinical trial registration: Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (REBEC) number RBR-88bs9x and ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT04561219.

Indexed as

biomarkersclinical improvementCombiROCCOVID-19LASSOmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40385586
PMCPMC12081340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.