ArticleDrugs in context2025
Upadacitinib for the treatment of radiographic axial spondyloarthritis - case series and review of the literature.
Article in Drugs in context, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Upadacitinib is a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor approved for the treatment of different rheumatic diseases, including axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). In phase III clinical trials, upadacitinib was associated with rapid and significant improvement in disease parameters, including scores for pain, function and mobility, signs of structural damage, and patient-reported outcomes, and had an overall incidence of adverse events similar to that in the placebo group. Improvement in axSpA disease severity was observed in both biologic-naive patients and those with prior biologic exposure, and this improvement was sustained during open-label treatment. Indirect comparisons with other agents suggest that upadacitinib is more effective than biologics and other JAK inhibitors in patients with axSpA and is associated with the lowest number-needed-to-treat. Long-term safety data indicate that upadacitinib is well tolerated in patients with axSpA, with a low rate of infections, malignancies, major adverse cardiovascular events and thromboembolism. Four case studies described here illustrate the effectiveness of upadacitinib in a range of real-world patients with axSpA, including patients with early disease and those who have been pre-treated with biologics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.