ReviewPortuguese journal of public health2025
Electronic Transfusion Safety System: Characterization of Patient Safety Incidents.
Review in Portuguese journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The healthcare system is complex and dynamic, and the implementation of information technology is seen as an important aid to patient safety. Data reveal that 1 in every 10 patients in developed countries is affected by a clinical error. The transfusion process involves several stakeholders and multiple stages with various critical points within the hospital. This study aims to understand patient safety incidents caused by failures in the Electronic Transfusion Safety System (ETSS) based on barcode technology in a hospital setting, from storage to the administration of blood components to the patient. Methods: A retrospective study spanning 3 years (2021-2023) with a mixed-methods approach was chosen. A Focus Group with six experts was conducted, and 136 reports from the anonymized incident reporting database with the typology "Blood and Blood Products" from a hospital in Lisbon were analyzed. Results: The ETSS diagram using barcodes allowed for the identification and description of all stages and their stakeholders. The critical points identified were patient identification, multiple relabeling, and transportation. A higher incidence rate of near-miss events was observed during sample collection and prescription. Discussion: This ETSS is hybrid, meaning that it has both human and technological components. Since 96% of the incidents did not cause harm to the patient, error detection and prevention mechanisms are being activated. This study has demonstrated the importance of IT in the transfusion process, as well as the relevance of continuous investment and the involvement of all stakeholders for a better patient safety environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.