ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Computational Fluid Dynamics Based Risk-Stratification of Modified Blalock-Taussig-Thomas Shunt Thrombogenicity.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The modified Blalock-Taussig-Thomas shunt (mBTTS) is a critical palliative procedure for infants with single-ventricle physiology, but thrombosis-related occlusion affects 8-12% of cases and carries nearly 50% mortality. Meanwhile, existing antithrombotic strategies fail to address the hemodynamic factors driving thrombosis, highlighting the need for a deeper understanding of flow dynamics in shunt failure. Objectives: This study aims to identify how mBTTS geometry influences hemodynamics and thrombosis risk, providing quantitative guidance for surgical planning and shunt design optimization. Methods: We used patient-specific imaging data to construct 54 idealized mBTTS configurations, systematically varying key geometric factors; pulmonary artery diameter, shunt diameter, and insertion angle. Using computational fluid dynamics, we analyzed how these variables influence wall shear rate (WSR), elongational strain rate (ESR), and turbulence intensity (TI); hemodynamic parameters known to affect thrombosis risk, to identify patterns linked to thrombosis. Results: We computationally identified optimal geometric configurations. Peak WSR and ESR were primarily located at bifurcation points, while peak TI was concentrated within the shunt channel. Shunt insertion distal to the right carotid artery with a 60° insertion angle and with a 4.0mm shunt graft demonstrated the most favorable hemodynamic profiles to prevent clots. Statistical analysis confirmed strong correlations between geometric parameters and flow characteristics. Conclusion: Results provide a framework for optimizing mBTTS design to reduce thrombosis risk based on hemodynamic risk factors, including actionable recommendations for shunt placement and design. These insights provide a foundation for hemodynamically guided surgical interventions with potential to improve survival rates in this high-risk patient population and for broader applications in cardiovascular surgery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.