Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40385407›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

Digitally Delivered, Systemically Challenged: A Qualitative Study of Health System Readiness for Digital Care.

Laurel O'Connor, Leah Dunkel, Andrew C Weitz, Allan Walkey, Peter K Lindenauer, Apurv Soni

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Leah Dunkel
Andrew C Weitz
Allan Walkey
Peter K Lindenauer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital health technologies can expand healthcare access, improve care coordination, and reduce costs. However, integrating these tools into routine care faces complex barriers. Understanding health system leader perspectives is essential for developing scalable, sustainable digital solutions.

objectiveTo explore the attitudes, experiences, and priorities of health system stakeholders regarding the implementation of digital health technologies in clinical practice.

methodsThe study team conducted semi-structured interviews with 12 stakeholders from diverse U.S. health systems, including clinical, operational, and executive leadership. Interviewees were selected using purposeful and snowball sampling. Interviews were transcribed, de-identified, and analyzed thematically using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). A constant comparative coding process was used to identify and organize key themes.

resultsParticipants saw digital tools as a way to enhance healthcare access and efficiency and improve public health operations, especially in rural or underserved settings. However, several major adoption challenges emerged including (1) integrating digital tools into existing workflows and electronic health record is operationally burdensome; (2) digital care can introduce risks to quality, continuity, and equity; and (3) external factors (reimbursement policy, regulatory constraints, infrastructure investment) are critical to long-term adoption.

conclusionsDigital health is seen as essential to the future of healthcare delivery, but meaningful integration requires alignment across clinical, operational, and policy domains. Coordinated investment, regulatory reform, and robust data infrastructure are needed to ensure digital solutions are scalable and sustainable.

Identifiers

PMID40385407
PMCPMC12083613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.