ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Generalizable AI predicts immunotherapy outcomes across cancers and treatments.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards Precision Oncology: How Advances in Cancer Genomics, Immunobiology and Artificial Intelligence Will Change Molecular Diagnostics.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for optimization of immunotherapy: current applications and transformative potential.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Pharmacological strategies to overcome immune checkpoint inhibitor resistance in non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have become standard care across many cancers, but most patients do not respond. Predicting response remains challenging due to complex tumor-immune interactions and the poor generalizability of current biomarkers and models. Predictors such as tumor mutational burden, PD-L1 expression, and transcriptomic signatures often fail across cancer types, therapies, and clinical settings. There is a clear need for a robust, interpretable model that captures shared immune response principles and adapts to diverse clinical contexts. We present Compass, a foundation model for predicting immunotherapy response from pan-cancer transcriptomic data using a concept bottleneck architecture. Compass encodes tumor gene expression through 44 biologically grounded immune concepts representing immune cell states, tumor-microenvironment interactions, and signaling pathways. Trained on 10,184 tumors across 33 cancer types, Compass outperforms 22 baseline methods in 16 independent clinical cohorts spanning seven cancers and six immune checkpoint inhibitors, increasing precision by 8.5%, Matthews correlation coefficient by 12.3%, and area under the precision-recall curve by 15.7%, with minimal or no additional training. The model generalizes to unseen cancer types and treatments, supporting indication selection and patient stratification in early-phase clinical trials. Survival analysis shows that Compass-stratified responders have significantly longer overall survival (hazard ratio = 4.7,
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.