ArticleBrain communications2025
Multimodal deep learning model for prediction of prognosis in central nervous system inflammation.
Article in Brain communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence for pediatric neuroimaging.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Benchmarking Multimodal Deep Fusion Strategies for Heterogeneous Neuroimaging and Cognitive Data Using a Controlled Sex Classification Task.Brain sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflammatory diseases of the CNS impose a substantial disease burden, necessitating prompt and appropriate prognosis prediction. We developed a multimodal deep learning model integrating clinical features and brain MRI data to enhance early prognosis prediction of CNS inflammation. This retrospective study used thin-cut T1-weighted brain MRI scans and the clinical variables of patients with CNS inflammation who were admitted to a tertiary referral hospital between January 2010 and December 2023. Data collected after January 2022 served as the external test set. 3D MRI images were first segmented into 43 brain regions using the FastSurfer library. The segmented images were then processed through a 3D convolutional neural network model for feature extraction and vectorization, after which they were integrated with clinical features for prediction. The performance of each artificial intelligence model was assessed using accuracy, F1 score, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the precision-recall curve. The internal dataset comprised 413 images from 291 patients (mean age, 45.5 years ± 19.3 [SD]; 151 male patients; 54 with poor prognosis). The external dataset comprised 210 images from 106 patients (mean age, 45.5 years ± 18.9 [SD]; 59 male patients; 31 with poor prognosis). The multimodal deep learning model outperformed unimodal models across all aetiological groups, achieving area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 0.8048 for autoimmune, 0.9107 for bacterial, 1.0000 for tuberculosis and 0.9242 for viral infections. Furthermore, artificial intelligence assistance improved clinicians' prognostic accuracy, as demonstrated in comparisons with neurologists, paediatricians and radiologists. Our findings demonstrate that the multimodal deep learning model enhances artificial intelligence-assisted prognosis prediction in CNS inflammation, improving both model performance and clinician decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.