ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Efficacy and safety of thermal ablation for Bethesda III/IV thyroid nodules: a retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of thermal ablation (TA) for the treatment of Bethesda III and IV thyroid nodules. Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 154 patients with Bethesda III (n = 82) and IV (n = 72) thyroid nodules treated with microwave or radiofrequency ablation between December 2016 and October 2023. Patients were followed for a median of 19 months. Outcomes assessed included nodule volume reduction rate (VRR), complications, and disease progression. Results: The median VRR at 12 months was 97% (Bethesda III) and 88% (Bethesda IV), increasing to 100% and 96% by 36 months, respectively, with no significant differences between groups. No major complications were encountered, minor complications occurred in 4 patients (4/154, 2.6%), including 3 cases of transient hoarseness and 1 case of neck pain, resolving spontaneously. Disease progression (3/154, 1.9%) occurred in both groups, with new tumor in each group, no other disease progression occurred. Conclusion: Thermal ablation could be a safe, effective, and minimally invasive alternative to surgery for Bethesda III/IV thyroid nodules, achieving substantial volume reduction with minimal complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.