ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2025
Diagnosis of necrotic and non-necrotic small bowel strangulation: The importance of intestinal congestion.
Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Laparoscopic Versus Open Approach for Strangulated Small Bowel Obstruction: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.World journal of surgery · 2026Article
- A novel predictive scoring system for irreversible intestinal ischemia in patients with strangulated bowel obstruction.Surgery today · 2026Article
- Using computed tomography imaging for the quantitative assessment of bowel viability in incarcerated groin hernia.Surgery today · 2025Article
- Diagnosis of necrotic and non-necrotic small bowel strangulation: The importance of intestinal congestion.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite the prevalence of laparoscopic techniques in abdominal surgeries today, bowel obstruction remains a potentially serious complication. Small bowel strangulation (SBS), in particular, is a critical condition that can lead to patient mortality. However, the prognosis for SBS is favorable if surgery is performed before the onset of necrosis. Non-necrotic SBS is a reversible condition in which blood flow can be restored by relieving the strangulation. The purpose of this study was to identify sensitive and specific contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) findings that are useful for diagnosis of both non-necrotic and necrotic SBS. Methods: We included patients diagnosed with SBS and simple bowel obstruction (SBO) who underwent contrast-enhanced CT followed by surgery from 2006 to 2023. Two gastrointestinal surgeons independently assessed the images retrospectively. Results: Eighty SBO and 141 SBS patients were included. Eighty-seven had non-necrotic SBS and 54 had necrotic SBS. Mesenteric edema was most frequently observed in both necrotic and non-necrotic SBS cases followed by abnormal bowel wall thickening. These two findings were observed significantly less frequently in SBO. Bowel hypo-enhancement is identified in only about half of the non-necrotic SBS cases, and it was detected at significantly higher rates in necrotic SBS compared to non-necrotic. Conclusion: Mesenteric edema and abnormal bowel wall thickening are sensitive and specific signs of both non-necrotic and necrotic SBS. These two findings indicate mesenteric and bowel congestion. Detecting intestinal congestion can lead to an accurate diagnosis of SBS, particularly in case of non-necrotic SBS, where bowel hypo-enhancement may sometimes be absent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.