ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2025
Nationwide medical database study for postoperative nutritional management in patients undergoing gastroenterological cancer surgery.
Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between prescribed parenteral energy doses and the composite of clinical adverse events in adult patients after gastrointestinal cancer surgery: A retrospective cohort study.JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition · 2026Article
- Associations between parenteral energy or amino acid doses and clinical outcomes in fasting patients undergoing gastroenterological cancer surgery: a nationwide cohort study using real-world data.Gastroenterology report · 2026Article
- Nationwide medical database study for postoperative nutritional management in patients undergoing gastroenterological cancer surgery.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: The study aimed to clarify how nutrition was managed in patients based on surgical site during the first 7 d after gastroenterological cancer surgery. Methods: A Japanese medical claims database was used to identify patients who had gastroenterological cancer surgery from 2011 to 2022. Patients were divided into groups based on the surgical sites, and postoperative feeding routes and timing of initiation of oral intake for groups were assessed. For the subset of patients fasting postoperatively for ≥7 d, the proportion of patients prescribed target doses of energy (20 kcal/kg) and amino acids (0.8 g/kg) on postoperative d 7 were assessed. Results: Surgical sites of 360 296 study patients were: esophagus, 14 784; stomach, 103 339; colon/rectum, 194 049; liver, 19 277; gallbladder/bile duct, 8279; pancreas, 20 568. The median postoperative day of oral intake initiation was: esophagus, seven; stomach and pancreas, four; colon/rectum and gallbladder/bile duct, three; liver, two. The proportions of fasting patients prescribed target doses of energy and amino acids on postoperative d 7 were: esophagus, 42.6% and 34.4%; stomach, 21.8% and 28.0%; colon/rectum, 20.9% and 29.1%; liver, 21.2% and 22.5%; gallbladder/bile duct, 31.0% and 33.4%; pancreas, 28.2% and 37.8%, respectively. Conclusion: Oral intake after gastroenterological cancer surgery was started earliest in patients undergoing liver surgery and latest in patients undergoing esophageal surgery. Target parenteral energy and amino acid doses were prescribed to less than half of fasting patients. Education is needed to promote early initiation of oral intake and the use of guidelines-based parenteral nutrition dosing in patients after gastroenterological cancer surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.