Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40385325›Full record

ArticleSleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society2025

Changes in sleep architecture during recurrent cycles of sleep restriction: a comparison between stable and variable short sleep schedules.

Tiffany B Koa, Ju Lynn Ong, June C Lo

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04731662 (Effects of Recurrent Short and Variable Sleep on Cognitive Performance, Brain Dynamics, Psychological Well-being, and Glucose Metabolism), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04731662 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Recurrent Short and Variable Sleep on Cognitive Performance, Brain Dynamics, Psychological Well-being, and Glucose Metabolism

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational University of SingaporeRan2021 to 2022Enrolled59ConditionsSleep, Sleep RestrictionArmsShort sleep, Variable short sleep
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tiffany B KoaCentre for Sleep and Cognition and Human Potential Translational Research Programme, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8807-0051
Ju Lynn OngCentre for Sleep and Cognition and Human Potential Translational Research Programme, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5115-4112
June C LoCentre for Sleep and Cognition and Human Potential Translational Research Programme, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7707-7557

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study Objectives: To examine how sleep architecture changes over successive cycles of restricted and recovery sleep in young adults, and to determine whether sleep-restricted schedules with differing night-to-night variability in sleep durations lead to different sleep physiological responses. Methods: In this 15-night laboratory-based study, 52 healthy young adults (25 males, age: 21-28) were randomly assigned to one of three sleep schedules: stable short, variable short, or control. They underwent two baseline nights of 8-h time-in-bed (TIB), followed by two cycles of "weekday" sleep opportunity manipulation and "weekend" recovery (8-h TIB). During each manipulation period, the stable short sleep and the control groups received 6-h and 8-h TIBs each night, respectively, while the variable short sleep group received 8-h, 4-h, 8-h, 4-h, and 6-h TIBs from the first to the fifth night. Polysomnography was conducted every night. Results: Sleep architecture changes induced by both short sleep schedules returned to baseline levels following the first or second recovery night and were largely similar between the first and second periods of sleep restriction. Sleep parameters averaged across each sleep restriction or recovery period showed no significant differences between the two short sleep groups. Conclusions: The similar sleep physiological responses in the two sleep restriction periods suggest that in young adults, sleep architecture does not adapt to recurrent weeks of moderate partial sleep loss, and such sleep patterns did not have compounding effects on sleep architecture. Furthermore, overall, increasing night-to-night variability in sleep duration did not have much additional impact on sleep physiological responses relative to a stable short sleep schedule. Clinical Trial: Performance, Mood, and Brain and Metabolic Functions During Different Sleep Schedules (STAVAR), https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04731662, NCT04731662.

Indexed as

intraindividual sleep variabilitypartial sleep deprivationrecovery sleepsleep architectureslow wave activity

Identifiers

PMID40385325
PMCPMC12084804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.