Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40385322›Full record

ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2025

Improving care and equity in the American trauma system: past, present and future.

Sophia Smith, Dane R Scantling

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sophia SmithDepartment of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5036-3868
Dane R ScantlingDepartment of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trauma care in the USA is fragmented, unequal, and millions of people lack adequate access to a trauma center. These inequities are the result of historic precedent, racial and socioeconomic discrimination, and the economics of trauma care. The fixed location of trauma centers may also fail to meet the needs of moving and changing populations. Further, the current methods of trauma center formation perpetuate existing inequity by leaving the pursuit of trauma center creation up to hospitals, resulting in verification and designation processes that are mostly reliant on financial capability rather than community need. This particularly impacts those who are socioeconomically vulnerable, as existing trauma centers may not be accessible to their communities and new centers may not seek to serve them. On the contrary, already well-resourced communities increasingly receive duplicative care. A thorough understanding of the interplay between trauma center designation, socioeconomic and geographic disparities in trauma care-and potential levers for change-is crucial in trauma systems planning for more equitable trauma care.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesHealthcare disparitiesHealth Care Quality, Access, And Evaluationwounds and injuries

Identifiers

PMID40385322
PMCPMC12083362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.