ReviewCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2025
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and valvular heart diseases: a suggested protocol for congenital lesions.
Review in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multimodal diagnostic imaging for early mitral valve disease: integration of current and emerging modalities-a narrative review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Valvular heart diseases (VHDs) require definition of anatomy, severity, and risk stratification to best define procedural need, type of intervention and seriate follow-up. Congenital lesions are much rarer and often associated with more complex lesions. Among noninvasive imaging modalities, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) represents a fundamental tool for complete assessment and quantification of VHDs. CMR can provide wide anatomical views on cardiac and extra-cardiac structures in any plane orientation, flow and volume quantification, as well as information on ventricular remodeling and viability. In the context of valve stenosis, quantification by CMR is based primarily on direct measurement of valve orifice at maximal valve opening, although CMR data remain less reliable than standard echocardiography due to reduced temporal resolution. Definition of great vessels anatomy by CMR can allow differentiation of valvular, subvalvular or supravalvular lesions. For valve regurgitation, CMR is the gold standard for quantification of ventricular volumes and function and for direct calculation of regurgitation of the semilunar valves with through-plane phase-contrast images. Additional flow measurements can be integrated to cross-check quantitative data on great vessels flow and stroke volumes. A standardized approach is recommended in CMR studies. A minimum CMR dataset should include two-dimensional cine and phase-contrast sequences, and three-dimensional whole heart imaging. This should be applied in the clinical practice to assess VHDs, including most complex congenital lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.