Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40385264›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthy eating and active living2024

Factors influencing likelihood of participation in green social prescriptions in an international sample.

Nicole E Odell, Deepti Adlakha, Katarzyna Olcoń, Michelle Kondo, Thomas Astell-Burt, Xiaoqi Feng, J Aaron Hipp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthy eating and active living, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Nature Contact as an Aspect of Active Living.Journal of healthy eating and active living · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicole E OdellDepartment of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management, College of Natural Resources, North Carolina State University, U.S.A.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1806-980X
Deepti AdlakhaFaculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Technische Universiteit Delft (TU Delft), The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1720-6780
Katarzyna OlcońSchool of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3459-3823
Michelle KondoUS Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9152-1589
Thomas Astell-BurtSchool of Architecture, Design and Planning, University of Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1498-4851
Xiaoqi FengPopulation Wellbeing and Environment Research Lab (PowerLab), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3421-220X
J Aaron HippDepartment of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management, College of Natural Resources, North Carolina State University, U.S.A.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2394-7112

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Green social prescriptions (GSPs) include interventions designed to combat sedentary behavior and preventable diseases by leveraging the benefits of nature-based physical activity. As these programs are still evolving, there is limited data regarding the likelihood of participation from an international perspective. This study examined factors influencing participation likelihood in GSPs across various geographic contexts, levels of greenness, nature-relatedness, well-being, and socio-demographic variables. We conducted an online, cross-sectional survey with 2,467 participants from Australia, India, Singapore, the United Kingdom, and the United States in September 2022. Participants reported their likelihood of participating in GSPs with four distinct outcomes, and we calculated an aggregate participation likelihood score. We used linear regression models to analyze associations between variables and participation likelihood, including models stratified by gender and country. Results showed that a more positive attitude towards nature was the strongest predictor of participation likelihood. Positive associations were found with educational attainment, financial comfort, and time spent in greenspace, while male gender and better well-being were linked to lower participation likelihood. Some differences in associations were revealed when stratified by country. An interaction between urban setting and greenness indicated that individuals in greener urban areas, particularly males, were less likely to feel the need for GSPs. These findings highlight that GSPs are likely to reach people who already share positive attitudes towards nature. Results indicate targeted interventions may be useful for individuals with less favorable attitudes towards nature, and males in particular, to increase likelihood of participation. Further research should explore cultural differences and the impact of health status on GSP participation. Understanding these factors can inform more equitable and effective GSP implementation.

Indexed as

Green social prescriptionsNDVINR-6urban greennesswell-being

Identifiers

PMID40385264
PMCPMC12080408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.