Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40385252›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

From Immersion to Seizure: A Novel Case of Water Intoxication Complicating a Water Birth.

Sarah Al-Musawi, Rukhsana Iqbal, Greeshma Rajeev

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah Al-MusawiObstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals of Northamptonshire, Northampton, GBR.
Rukhsana IqbalObstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals of Northamptonshire, Northampton, GBR.
Greeshma RajeevObstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals of Northamptonshire, Northampton, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water immersion birth (WIB) is increasingly used for pain relief during labour, offering high maternal satisfaction and reduced need for epidural analgesia. However, its potential complications, particularly regarding fluid and electrolyte balance, remain underexplored. We report a case of a healthy 33-year-old woman who developed a generalized tonic-clonic seizure two hours after delivering via WIB. Her antenatal course and labour progression were clinically normal; however, she experienced retention of urine and continued fluid intake during her four hours of immersion. Post-seizure investigations revealed serum sodium measured at 124 mmol/L indicated severe hyponatremia and metabolic acidosis. Neurological imaging and EEG were unremarkable. With supportive care and correction of sodium levels, her condition stabilized. This case highlights the possibility of dilutional hyponatremia associated with prolonged WIB, especially when coupled with high fluid intake and delayed urine output. Water immersion may promote vasopressin release, impair free water clearance, and precipitate acute symptomatic hyponatremia. Although WIB is generally safe, prolonged immersion and unmonitored fluid intake may increase the risk of water intoxication. Vigilant monitoring of fluid balance is essential to prevent complications. In selected cases, serum sodium monitoring should be considered, particularly with prolonged immersion or abnormal urinary output.

Indexed as

acute hyponatremiageneralized seizureperipartum morbiditywater birthwater-electrolyte balancewater immersionwater immersion birthwater intoxication

Identifiers

PMID40385252
PMCPMC12085983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.