Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40385240›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science

CatSkill: Artificial Intelligence-Based Metrics for the Assessment of Surgical Skill Level from Intraoperative Cataract Surgery Video Recordings.

Binh Duong Giap, Dena Ballouz, Karthik Srinivasan, Jefferson Lustre, Keely Likosky, Ossama Mahmoud, Shahzad I Mian, Bradford L Tannen, Nambi Nallasamy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Binh Duong GiapDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Dena BallouzDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Karthik SrinivasanDepartment of Vitreo Retinal, Aravind Eye Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Jefferson LustreDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Keely LikoskyDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Ossama MahmoudDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Shahzad I MianDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Bradford L TannenDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Nambi NallasamyDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To develop and validate a novel artificial intelligence (AI)-powered video analysis system to assess surgeon proficiency in maintaining (1) eye neutrality, (2) eye centration, and (3) adequate focus of the operating microscope in cataract surgery and evaluate differences in these metrics between attending cataract surgeons and ophthalmology residents. Design: A retrospective surgical video analysis. Subjects: Six hundred twenty complete surgical video recordings of 620 cataract surgeries performed by either attending surgeons or ophthalmology residents. Main Outcome Measures: Performance of the proposed AI-powered video analysis system (CatSkill) for cataract surgery was evaluated at multiple stages. Anatomy and surgical landmark segmentation were reported as Dice coefficients. The proposed cataract surgery assessment metrics (CSAMs) were compared between attending and resident surgeons on a phase-wise basis. Surgery-level classification performance (attending vs. resident) of a machine learning (ML) algorithm trained on the CSAMs was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Methods: An automated system involving video preprocessing, deep learning-based segmentation with limbus obstruction detection and compensation, and CSAM computation was designed to assess surgeon performance based on surgical videos. Three CSAMs were computed to analyze 430 cataract surgeries (254 attendings and 176 residents). An ML algorithm was developed to predict surgeon training level using only CSAMs. Results: The CatSkill system using FPN (VGG16) achieved a Dice coefficient of 94.03% for segmentation of palpebral fissure, limbus, and Purkinje image 1. The phase-wise mean CSAM scores were higher for attendings than residents across all surgical phases. Residents struggled with stability/centration during the Main Wound, Cortical Removal, Lens Insertion, and Wound Closure phases, and had difficulty maintaining adequate microscope focus during later phases of surgery. A random forest model using CSAMs achieved an AUC of 0.865 in predicting the skill level (attending or resident) of the surgeon. Conclusions: The proposed AI-derived CSAMs provide a high level of reliability in assessing the ability of surgeons to maintain eye neutrality, centration, and focus level during cataract surgery. Furthermore, downstream analysis using an ML model for surgical-level classification indicates that the proposed CSAMs provide significant predictive value for assessing the overall training level of the surgeon. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

Cataract surgeryDeep learningSegmentationSurgery skill assessmentVideo analysis

Identifiers

PMID40385240
PMCPMC12084080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.