ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2025
Automatic diagnosis of extraocular muscle palsy based on machine learning and diplopia images.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo develop different machine learning models to train and test diplopia images and data generated by the computerized diplopia test.
methodsDiplopia images and data generated by computerized diplopia tests, along with patient medical records, were retrospectively collected from 3244 cases. Diagnostic models were constructed using logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), support vector machine (SVM), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and deep learning (DL) algorithms. A total of 2757 diplopia images were randomly selected as training data, while the test dataset contained 487 diplopia images. The optimal diagnostic model was evaluated using test set accuracy, confusion matrix, and precision-recall curve (P-R curve).
resultsThe test set accuracy of the LR, SVM, DT, XGBoost, DL (64 categories), and DL (6 binary classifications) algorithms was 0.762, 0.811, 0.818, 0.812, 0.858 and 0.858, respectively. The accuracy in the training set was 0.785, 0.815, 0.998, 0.965, 0.968, and 0.967, respectively. The weighted precision of LR, SVM, DT, XGBoost, DL (64 categories), and DL (6 binary classifications) algorithms was 0.74, 0.77, 0.83, 0.80, 0.85, and 0.85, respectively; weighted recall was 0.76, 0.81, 0.82, 0.81, 0.86, and 0.86, respectively; weighted F1 score was 0.74, 0.79, 0.82, 0.80, 0.85, and 0.85, respectively.
conclusionIn this study, the 7 machine learning algorithms all achieve automatic diagnosis of extraocular muscle palsy. The DL (64 categories) and DL (6 binary classifications) algorithms have a significant advantage over other machine learning algorithms regarding diagnostic accuracy on the test set, with a high level of consistency with clinical diagnoses made by physicians. Therefore, it can be used as a reference for diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.