ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2025
Corneal biomechanical properties in myopic anisometropia measured by corneal visualization scheimpflug technology.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Predictive Model for Personalized Fitting of Peripheral Defocus Spectacles Based on Ocular Biometric Parameters.Clinical optometry · 2026Article
- The correlation between myopia severity and stress-strain index (SSI) using the Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology (Corvis ST).Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Anisometropia in children: Current understanding and clinical implications.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore corneal biomechanical properties in patients with myopic anisometropia using a corneal visualization scheimpflug technology (Corvis ST).
methodsWe examined 102 eyes from 51 adults with anisometropia (minimum spherical equivalent (SE) of 2.50 D). Patients were classified into two groups based on their SE: high myopia (SE ≥ -6.00 D) (n=52 eyes) and non-high myopia group (SE ≤ -6.00 D) (n=50 eyes). Corneal biomechanical and ocular biometric parameters were measured.
resultsIn the high myopia group, axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and central corneal thickness (CCT) were significantly higher compared to the non-high myopia group (all P < 0.001). The second applanation time (A2-time), length of flattened cornea at second applanation (A2-length), and time to highest concavity (HC-time) were shorter in the high myopia group (all P < 0.001). The high myopia group also exhibited lower elasticity and rigidity indices, higher EAI (all P < 0.001), and greater central/mid-peripheral deformation amplitudes (both P < 0.001), with minimal peripheral differences (P=0.074).
conclusionCorVis ST provides a reliable method for measuring corneal biomechanical properties. In anisometropia, eyes with higher myopia show higher deformation amplitude, faster A2-velocity, shorter A2-time and HC-time, and reduced A2-length.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.