ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2025
Diagnostic efficiency of peripheral tumor serum biomarkers in lung cancer and their correlation with clinicopathological features.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Differential analysis of lung adenocarcinoma and lung squamous cell carcinoma based on serum tumor markers: diagnostic performance and clinical utility.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the clinical value of serum tumor markers - carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), endothelial cell-specific molecule-1 (ESM-1), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1) - in the diagnosis of lung cancer, and to evaluate the role of preoperative imaging in lung cancer diagnosis.
methodsA total of 56 lung cancer patients, diagnosed at The Fourth Hospital of Daqing City between January 2022 and December 2023, were included in the lung cancer group. Additionally, 69 patients with benign pulmonary tumors diagnosed during the same period were included in the benign tumor group. Preoperative peripheral serum levels of CEA, CYFRA21-1, NSE, and ESM-1 were compared between the two groups. The expression profiles of these biomarkers were further analyzed, focusing on their correlation with TNM staging, lymph node metastasis, and tumor differentiation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to assess the diagnostic performance of these biomarkers. Imaging characteristics were also compared between the two groups to identify features indicative of lung cancer.
resultsSerum levels of CYFRA21-1, CEA, ESM-1, and NSE were significantly higher in the lung cancer group compared to the benign tumor group (all P < 0.05). Pathological analysis revealed that these markers were notably associated with low to medium tumor differentiation, lymph node metastasis, and advanced stage (III-IV) (all P < 0.05). Additionally, small cell lung cancer patients exhibited higher positive rates of CYFRA21-1 and elevated levels of CEA, ESM-1, and NSE compared to non-small cell lung cancer patients. ROC curve analysis demonstrated AUC values of 0.878, 0.778, 0.773, and 0.654 for CYFRA21-1, CEA, ESM-1, and NSE, respectively. Imaging features, including spiculated margins, lobulation, pleural retraction, vascular convergence, vacuolar signs, and larger nodule size, were more prevalent in lung cancer patients and were identified as independent risk factors for lung cancer.
conclusionPeripheral serum biomarkers, including CYFRA21-1, CEA, ESM-1, and NSE, demonstrate significant diagnostic potential for lung cancer. Furthermore, imaging characteristics provide valuable insights for distinguishing lung cancer, underscoring the clinical applicability of both diagnostic approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.