Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40385000›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of translational research2025

Advances in optical and pharmacological strategies for myopia correction in children.

Mengyao Xu, Fengju Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mengyao XuBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Lab Beijing 100730, China.
Fengju ZhangBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Lab Beijing 100730, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myopia in children has become a global public health concern due to its increasing prevalence and potential long-term complications. Optical interventions, including single-vision lenses (SVL), bifocal/progressive addition lenses (PALs), peripheral defocus-incorporated multiple segments (DIMS) glasses, and orthokeratology (OK) lenses have shown varying success in slowing progression, though long-term safety and efficacy remain under investigation. Pharmacological treatments, including low-dose atropine (0.01%), pirenzepine, apomorphine, and 7-methylxanthine (7-MX), offer additional options. Low-dose atropine is the most effective, significantly reducing myopia progression with minimal side effects. Pirenzepine, though promising in animal models, faces challenges due to poor corneal permeability. Apomorphine shows potential but requires further clinical testing. 7-MX has demonstrated dose-dependent effects in slowing progression, yet its efficacy needs validation in broader populations. Emerging therapies like low-level red-light therapy (LLRT) and Diffusion Optics Technology (DOT) lenses also show promise, reducing axial elongation and refractive progression. However, their long-term safety and mechanisms remain unclear. In conclusion, while several interventions show potential, further long-term studies and personalized treatment strategies are needed to optimize outcomes. Future research should focus on new drug targets, technologies, and global collaboration to address the myopia crisis in children.

Indexed as

Childrenmyopiamyopia control

Identifiers

PMID40385000
PMCPMC12082519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.