ReviewAmerican journal of translational research2025
Advances in optical and pharmacological strategies for myopia correction in children.
Review in American journal of translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- STudy of Atropine to Reduce (STAR) Myopia Progression in Children: 24-Month Results of a Randomized, Double-Masked, Vehicle-Controlled Trial of Atropine Sulfate 0.01% and 0.03.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Real-world evidence for atropine titration in myopia control: a comparative study of three low-dose regimens in Chinese children.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myopia in children has become a global public health concern due to its increasing prevalence and potential long-term complications. Optical interventions, including single-vision lenses (SVL), bifocal/progressive addition lenses (PALs), peripheral defocus-incorporated multiple segments (DIMS) glasses, and orthokeratology (OK) lenses have shown varying success in slowing progression, though long-term safety and efficacy remain under investigation. Pharmacological treatments, including low-dose atropine (0.01%), pirenzepine, apomorphine, and 7-methylxanthine (7-MX), offer additional options. Low-dose atropine is the most effective, significantly reducing myopia progression with minimal side effects. Pirenzepine, though promising in animal models, faces challenges due to poor corneal permeability. Apomorphine shows potential but requires further clinical testing. 7-MX has demonstrated dose-dependent effects in slowing progression, yet its efficacy needs validation in broader populations. Emerging therapies like low-level red-light therapy (LLRT) and Diffusion Optics Technology (DOT) lenses also show promise, reducing axial elongation and refractive progression. However, their long-term safety and mechanisms remain unclear. In conclusion, while several interventions show potential, further long-term studies and personalized treatment strategies are needed to optimize outcomes. Future research should focus on new drug targets, technologies, and global collaboration to address the myopia crisis in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.