ReviewMedComm2025
Minimal Residual Disease Detection: Implications for Clinical Diagnosis and Cancer Patient Treatment.
Review in MedComm, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Measurable residual disease detected by next-generation sequencing in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Bioactive Anti-Inflammatory Compounds and Therapeutic Strategies for Promoting Resolution.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Targeting ZMIZ1 induces differentiation in acute myeloid leukemia via chromatin remodeling.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Article
- Review
- Review
- Review
- Ovarian tissue quality assessment and fertility preservation strategies enabled by multi-omics and artificial intelligence: current applications and clinical perspectives.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- [Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation: a review of clinical progress in fertility preservation].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2025Review
- Liquid Biopsy and Multi-Omic Biomarkers in Breast Cancer: Innovations in Early Detection, Therapy Guidance, and Disease Monitoring.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Minimal residual disease (MRD) serves as a pivotal biomarker for the clinical diagnosis and subsequent treatment of cancer patients. In hematological malignancies, MRD pose an increasingly serious threat to the health of Chinese people. Accurate MRD detection is essential for assessing relapse risk and optimizing therapeutic strategies, yet current methods such as flow cytometry, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and next-generation sequencing (NGS) each have distinct limitations, and significant gaps remain in achieving optimal sensitivity and specificity of these technologies. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of MRD detection methods, high-lighting their clinical implications, including their roles in treatment decision-making, risk stratification, and patient outcomes. It discusses the strengths and weaknesses of existing techniques and explores emerging technologies that promise enhanced diagnostic precision. Key advancements such as integrating NGS with other methodologies and novel approaches like liquid biopsy and PCR are examined. The review underscores the academic and practical value of early and accurate MRD detection, emphasizing its impact on improving patient management and treatment outcomes. By addressing the limitations of current technologies and exploring future directions, this review aims to advance the field and support personalized medicine approaches to cancer treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.