Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40384964›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025

Case Report: Difficult radial artery sheath removal: a report of two cases and review of the literature.

Bangguo Yang, Mengqi Yeh, Jie Bai

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bangguo YangDepartment of Cardiology, Fuwai Yunnan Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Kunming, China.
Mengqi YehDepartment of Cardiology, Fuwai Yunnan Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Kunming, China.
Jie BaiDepartment of Cardiology, Fuwai Yunnan Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Kunming, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transradial approach to coronary angiography and interventional therapy has gained worldwide popularity in recent years due to its lower rate of vascular complications compared to the femoral approach. We present two cases of patients who experienced difficulties in removing the radial artery sheath. In the first case, the sheath inadvertently fractured within the radial artery, but it was successfully extracted using hemostatic forceps. In the second case, a severe spasm of the radial artery complicated sheath removal, resulting in the sheath becoming stretched and deformed. Ultimately, the deformed sheath was removed slowly and successfully with the assistance of a guidewire and catheter. Furthermore, we conducted a review of existing literature to delineate management strategies for situations where sheath removal poses challenges.

Indexed as

coronary angiographycoronary artery diseaseradial artery spasmsheath removaltransradial

Identifiers

PMID40384964
PMCPMC12081404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.