ArticleOrthopedic reviews2025
Safety of Catheter-Based Cervical Epidural Steroid Injections: A Retrospective Review.
Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- CT-guided spinal nerve root adhesiolysis for refractory atypical symptoms in cervical disc herniation: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Lumbar Interlaminar Ventral Epidural Injection Without Catheter at L5-S1 for Lumbosacral Radicular Pain: A Pilot Feasibility Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cervical epidural steroid injections (CESIs) are frequently utilized for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy and axial neck pain. Given the anatomical complexity of the cervical spine, techniques that enhance precision while maintaining safety are essential. This case series evaluates the safety of a catheter-based approach for CESI, allowing targeted medication delivery to the affected spinal level. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of 9 patients who underwent cervical ESIs using a catheter-based technique. Under fluoroscopic guidance, the epidural space was accessed with a touhy needle, and a flexible catheter was advanced to the level of pathology for medication administration. All patients were monitored during and after the procedure for any complications. Results: All 9 procedures were successfully completed without any reported complications. There were no cases of dural puncture, neurological injury, or other adverse events associated with the procedure. Conclusion: This case series supports the safety and feasibility of catheter-based cervical epidural steroid injections. The technique allowed for accurate targeting of pathology without any observed complications. These preliminary findings warrant further investigation in larger, controlled studies to confirm safety and efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.