ArticleInfection and drug resistance2025
Assessment Framework for Infection Prevention and Control Competence in Trained Nurses in Regional Medical Communities: Development and Implementation.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop an assessment Framework for improving the competence of professional nurses in infection prevention and control within a regional medical community, and to evaluate the effectiveness of this system. Methods: Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used to determine the weights of each index. An evaluation index system was established with 3 primary indexes, 9 secondary indexes, and 28 tertiary indexes, based on expert input and guidelines. The assessment framework for infection prevention competence was then implemented in 20 professional nurses from the regional medical community, who received standardized training from January 2018 to December 2023. Results: The cumulative weights assigned to the primary indexes were 0.463, 0.317, and 0.220. For the secondary indexes, weights ranged from 0.025 to 0.293, and for the tertiary indexes, weights ranged from 0.003 to 0.100. After standardized training, the total competence score in infection prevention and control of nurses significantly increased from 79.50 to 89.75 ( Conclusion: The study successfully developed a scientifically robust evaluation system for the competence in infection prevention and control among professional nurses. Standardized training significantly enhanced nurses' capabilities, highlighting the importance of tailored training programs and continuous improvement of evaluation systems to meet evolving requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.