ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Detection-guided deep learning-based model with spatial regularization for lung nodule segmentation.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Graphicalized vision-language modeling for comprehensive lung nodule analysis and risk stratification.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- TFKT V2: task-focused knowledge transfer from natural images for computed tomography perceptual image quality assessment.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- A semisupervised knowledge distillation model for lung nodule segmentation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lung cancer ranks as one of the leading causes of cancer diagnosis and is the foremost cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The early detection of lung nodules is important in improving outcomes for patients, as it enables timely and effective treatment interventions. The segmentation of lung nodules plays a critical role in aiding physicians in distinguishing between malignant and benign lesions. However, this task remains challenging due to the substantial variation in the shapes and sizes of lung nodules, and their frequent proximity to lung tissues, which complicates clear delineation. We aim to develop an accurate and reliable lung nodule segmentation method to assist radiologists in improving diagnostic accuracy. Methods: We introduce a novel model for segmenting lung nodules in computed tomography (CT) images, leveraging a deep learning framework that integrates U-Net based segmentation and ResNet based classification processes. Feature combination blocks are applied to facilitate the sharing of information between the segmentation and classification components. Additionally, we employ the classification outcomes as priors to refine the size estimation of the segmentation outputs, and integrate the classification outcomes with a spatial regularization technique to enhance precision. Furthermore, recognizing the challenges posed by limited training datasets, we have developed an optimal transfer learning (TL) strategy that freezes certain layers to further improve performance. Results: The results show that our proposed model can capture the target nodules more accurately compared to other commonly used models. The ablation studies prove the positive effect of feature combination and spatial regularization. By applying TL, the performance can be further improved, achieving a sensitivity of 0.885, a Dice score of 0.814, a Hausdorff distance (HD) of 3.188 mm and an average symmetric surface distance (ASSD) of 0.280 mm. Conclusions: The proposed multitask model performs lung nodule segmentation while facilitating classification outputs with feature combination and through regularization. By utilizing TL, the model achieves strong performance even with limited training data. Its simplicity makes it adaptable and provides a foundation for further enhancements to suit other specific datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.