Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40384673›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy in unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis of efficacy and safety.

Hang Li, Yawei Li, Wendi Kang, Junqing Xi, Zhentao Yan, Zhengqiang Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hang Li *Department of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3947-1993
Yawei Li *Department of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Wendi KangDepartment of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Junqing XiDepartment of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Zhentao YanDepartment of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Zhengqiang YangDepartment of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is the second most prevalent primary liver cancer, and there are limited treatment options when resection is not eligible. Systemic chemotherapy (SYS) offers modest survival benefits, highlighting the need for more effective approaches. This study aimed to evaluate and compare hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with SYS in patients with unresectable iCCA in terms of efficacy and safety. Methods: A propensity score-matched analysis was conducted on 111 patients with unresectable iCCA from March 2019 to October 2023. The cohort comprised 37 HAIC-treated and 74 SYS-treated patients. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), while the secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs). Results: The HAIC group demonstrated comparable survival outcomes to those of the SYS group, with a median OS of 23.7 and 19.3 months [hazard ratio (HR) =0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53-1.35; P=0.487] and median PFS of 10.7 Conclusions: This study demonstrated that HAIC can achieve comparable survival outcomes with superior local tumor control and reduced systemic toxicity as compared to SYS, suggesting its potential as an alternative treatment option for select patients.

Indexed as

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC)intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA)systemic chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID40384673
PMCPMC12084753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.