ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy in unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis of efficacy and safety.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy for Cholangiocarcinoma in 2025.Liver cancer · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a nomogram comprising GLUT1 and clinical characteristics for predicting overall survival in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is the second most prevalent primary liver cancer, and there are limited treatment options when resection is not eligible. Systemic chemotherapy (SYS) offers modest survival benefits, highlighting the need for more effective approaches. This study aimed to evaluate and compare hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with SYS in patients with unresectable iCCA in terms of efficacy and safety. Methods: A propensity score-matched analysis was conducted on 111 patients with unresectable iCCA from March 2019 to October 2023. The cohort comprised 37 HAIC-treated and 74 SYS-treated patients. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), while the secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs). Results: The HAIC group demonstrated comparable survival outcomes to those of the SYS group, with a median OS of 23.7 and 19.3 months [hazard ratio (HR) =0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53-1.35; P=0.487] and median PFS of 10.7 Conclusions: This study demonstrated that HAIC can achieve comparable survival outcomes with superior local tumor control and reduced systemic toxicity as compared to SYS, suggesting its potential as an alternative treatment option for select patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.