ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Artificial intelligence-assisted tear meniscus height measurement: a multicenter study.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Diagnostic Guidance in Ocular Surface Disorders.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Association of a novel meibomian gland dysfunction composite score with corneal nerve parameters and ocular surface symptoms in dry eye disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Associations of tear mediators with ocular surface symptoms, signs, and corneal nerve morphology in dry eye disease: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Application in Cornea and External Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advances in AI-assisted quantification of dry eye indicators.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The tear meniscus height (TMH) is an important index for the diagnosis of dry eye. However, special inspection doctors are required to make rapid TMH measurements during outpatient examinations, which often leads to substantial measurement errors. At the same time, the existing artificial intelligence (AI) model of TMH segmentation has poor generalization because it only uses one mode of TMH pictures and does not include inspection of external verification sets. The purpose of this study was to propose an automatic measurement method for TMH based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to handle diverse datasets. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 3,894 TMH images from five centers across four regions in eastern, southern, and western China. The images were annotated using a gradient information-guided human-computer collaborative method, and an attention-limiting neural network (ALNN) was developed. An internal dataset, consisting of 834 color images and 1,105 infrared images from three centers, was constructed for model development and validation. An external validation set, comprising 996 color images and 959 infrared images from two additional centers, was used to test the model's generalizability. The accuracy of AI segmentation results was compared with the inspection reports of special inspection doctors. Results: In the test set for the color image modality, the segmentation results showed an average mean intersection over union (MIoU) of 0.9578, a recall rate of 0.9648, a precision of 0.9526, and an F1 score of 0.9576. The TMH results obtained on the test set (r=0.935, P<0.001) and on the external validation set (r=0.957, P<0.001) both showed a high correlation with the ground truth (GT). For the infrared image modality, the test set segmentation results showed an average MIoU of 0.9290, a recall rate of 0.9150, a precision of 0.9388, and an F1 score of 0.9249. The TMH results obtained on the test set (r=0.855, P<0.001) and on the external validation set (r=0.803, P<0.001) both showed a high correlation with the GT. Conclusions: This algorithm exhibits strong generalization capabilities, accurately segments key areas, and automatically provides quantitative analysis of the TMH. The measurements obtained using this AI algorithm exhibit high consistency with the GT, surpassing the reliability of special inspection doctors. This provides significant support in the diagnosis of dry eye disease (DED).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.