ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
High-frequency ultrasound shear wave dispersion imaging for male infertility: a pilot study.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ultrasound features for pediatric testicular lesions: 20 years of ultrasound practice interpreted through the 2022 WHO Classification.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The characteristics of testicular viscoelasticity could help identify azoospermia. This study sought to assess the diagnostic value of viscoelasticity for male infertility using high-frequency ultrasound shear wave dispersion (SWD) imaging. Methods: In this prospective study, 330 consecutive patients with male infertility were allocated to the ultrasound normal group, the varicocele group, the non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) group, and the obstructive azoospermia (OA) group, and 30 healthy volunteers were allocated to the control group. Two physicians with over 10 years of experience each in andrology ultrasound measured the viscosity coefficient, dispersion slope, and elasticity of each testis, respectively. The testicular viscoelasticity was compared among the patients from the four groups and the control group. The inter-reader variability between the two physicians was assessed. The diagnostic efficacy of viscoelasticity for NOA was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Binary logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors for NOA. Results: Among the 360 participants, the viscosity coefficient, dispersion slope, and elasticity were all higher in the NOA group than the other groups (P<0.001). The inter-reader variability was excellent [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.87-0.96]. Comparisons between the patient groups categorized by testicular volume (TV) revealed no statistically significant difference in the elasticity of testes with smaller volumes (5-10 mL) between the OA and NOA groups (P=0.130), but differences in the viscosity coefficient and dispersion slope were observed (P=0.009 and P=0.031, respectively). The ROC curve analysis showed that the viscosity coefficient had the highest diagnostic efficacy for NOA, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.834. In the logistic regression, the viscosity coefficient [odds ratio (OR) =665; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.62-2,732.64], elasticity (OR =1.35; 95% CI: 0.98-1.84), and TV (OR =0.51; 95% CI: 0.44-0.61) were identified as independent risk factors for NOA. Conclusions: The viscosity coefficient, dispersion slope, and elasticity all have diagnostic value for NOA. Unlike elasticity, the differential diagnosis of azoospermia by the viscosity coefficient and dispersion slope is not affected by TV. Testicular viscoelasticity can be effectively used in the differential diagnosis of azoospermia, especially in patients with slightly smaller testicles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.